Advances to sister concerns must be presumed to have come out of own funds and not borrowed funds
CIT vs. Reliance Utilities (Bombay High Court)
Where the assessee had its own funds as well as borrowed funds and it advanced funds to its sister concerns for allegedly non-business purposes and the question arose whether the AO was justified in disallowing the interest on the borrowed funds on the ground that they had been used for non-business purposes, HELD:
Where an assessee has his own funds as well as borrowed funds, a presumption can be made that the advances for non-business purposes have been made out of the own funds and that the borrowed funds have not been used for this purpose.
Accordingly, the disallowance of the interest on the borrowed funds is not justified
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Venkat Dhanyamraju
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(100)
-
▼
February
(13)
- Cos may’ve to divulge details of auditors to banks
- Accumulated Balance of Credit in CENVAT account as...
- SEZ an Introduction
- Advances to sister concerns
- advance tax interest u/s 234B and 234C
- Faster service tax refunds on cards
- SEZ + Registers
- SEBI notifies amendments for disclosure of pledged...
- Supreme Court on 'Allotment of Shares' and 'Issue ...
- Companies Bill, 2008: No advisory services by audi...
- Proof of travel not required for claiming LTA: Sup...
- Depreciation not debited to the profit and loss ac...
- ICAI Favour Rotation of Auditors After 3 Years
-
▼
February
(13)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome users to provide your valuable comments