NOTIFICATION NO. G.S.R. 11 (E), DATED 5-1-2009
In exercise of the powers conferred by clauses (a) and (b) of sub-section (1) of section 642 read with clause (45) of section 2 and section 383A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), the Central Government hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Companies (Appointment and Qualifications of Secretary) Rules, 1988, namely :-
1. (1) These rules may be called the Companies (Appointment and Qualifications of Secretary) Amendment Rules, 2009.
(2) They shall come into force from the 15th day of March, 2009.
2. In the Companies (Appointment and Qualifications) of Secretary) Rules, 1988, in rule 2,
(i) in sub-rule (1) and in the proviso to sub-rule (4), for the words “rupees two crores” the following words shall be substituted, namely:-
“Five crore rupees”;
(ii) in sub-rule (3), the second and third proviso shall be omitted;
(iii) after sub-rule (3), the following sub-rule shall be inserted, namely:-
“(3A) A company having a paid up share capital of two crore rupees or more but less than five crore rupees may appoint any individual who possesses the qualification of membership of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India constituted under the Company Secretaries Act, 1980
(56 of 1980), as a whole-time secretary to perform the duties of a secretary under the Companies Act, 1956:
Provided that where a company has appointed under sub-rule (3) or this sub-rule, a whole-time company secretary, possessing the qualification of membership of the Institute of Company Secretaries of India, such a company is not required to obtain a certificate from a secretary in
whole-time practice under rule 3 of the Companies (Compliance Certificate) Rules, 2001.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Venkat Dhanyamraju
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(100)
-
▼
January
(37)
- NOTIFICATION NO: 5/2009, Dated : January 7, 2009
- Govt on overdrive to grant service tax refunds to ...
- If only Raju had read Jack Welch
- NOTIFICATION NO. 11/2009
- NOTIFICATION NO. 11/2009
- eTDS Statement without sufficient valid PANs...
- NOTIFICATION NO. 10/2009
- NOTIFICATION NO: 5/2009, Dated : January 7, 2009
- Frauds can not be stopped by a defined audit process
- Software Licensing Not "Royalty"
- Related Party Transactions & Legal Provisions
- CARO, 2003 & Fixed Assets
- Applicability of transfer pricing provisions for r...
- How Satyam May have Inflated Cash & Bank Balance
- Big 4 Audit Firms - Status
- Indian stock markets already showing signs of resi...
- Why read an annual report?
- SWOT ANALYSIS
- Corporate Governance in Indian Companies
- No penal action on e-Returns with date stamp of 1s...
- TAX RECENT NOTIFICATIONS
- Income Tax department's website to get new address
- 115JB
- Deloitte, KPMG have no license to do audit work in...
- DEPRECIATION - Avoid Last Moment Purchase
- Failure to remit tax will invite prosecution: IT d...
- 100% I-T Waiver For SEZs Set Up Under Parent Cos
- INVOCATION OF SECTION 263 OF IT ACT ON GROUND OF D...
- ALLOWABILITY OF DEFERRED REVENUE EXPENDITURE UNDER...
- Some Recent Imp Case Laws on Direct Tax
- Appointment of a CS by companies- Limit increased ...
- Notification No.33/2008 ST dt 7th December, 2008.
- INVESTMENT PROOF FOR TDS CALCULATION
- Futures Contract
- No penal action on e-Returns with date stamp of 1s...
- Notification No. 3/2009, dated 5.1.2009 and Notif...
- Notification No. 1/2009, dated 5.1.2009
-
▼
January
(37)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome users to provide your valuable comments