Government notifies conditions for pre-paid meal cards for the purpose of FBT
As per section 115WB(2)(B)(iii), inserted from the assessment year 2009-10, hospitality expenditure for the purpose of levy of FBT, does not include any expenditure on or payment through non-transferable pre-paid electronic meal card usable only at eating joints or outlets and which fulfils other prescribed conditions. CBDT has now notified Rule 40E prescribing such conditions. Following conditions have been prescribed:
(i) The card shall be granted by the employer to its employees under a scheme framed by the employer specifying therein the circumstances under which the meal card can be used by the employee.
(ii) The card shall be issued by the issuing bank.
(iii) An employee shall not be issued more than one card.
(iv) The card shall bear the name of the employer along with the name, photograph and signature of the employee to whom the card is issued.
(v) The card shall be used only by the employee to whom the card is issued.
(vi) The card shall be used by the employee only for the purpose of purchasing ready to eat food or non-alcoholic beverage from a member establishment.
(vii) The aggregate amount of ready to eat food or non-alcoholic beverage purchased during a day by an employee shall not exceed one hundred rupees.
(viii) The details of each transaction of purchases made by the employee against the card shall be maintained by the employer and the member establishment in such manner and for such period as is required under the Act for any other similar transaction
Wednesday, January 7, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Venkat Dhanyamraju
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(100)
-
▼
January
(37)
- NOTIFICATION NO: 5/2009, Dated : January 7, 2009
- Govt on overdrive to grant service tax refunds to ...
- If only Raju had read Jack Welch
- NOTIFICATION NO. 11/2009
- NOTIFICATION NO. 11/2009
- eTDS Statement without sufficient valid PANs...
- NOTIFICATION NO. 10/2009
- NOTIFICATION NO: 5/2009, Dated : January 7, 2009
- Frauds can not be stopped by a defined audit process
- Software Licensing Not "Royalty"
- Related Party Transactions & Legal Provisions
- CARO, 2003 & Fixed Assets
- Applicability of transfer pricing provisions for r...
- How Satyam May have Inflated Cash & Bank Balance
- Big 4 Audit Firms - Status
- Indian stock markets already showing signs of resi...
- Why read an annual report?
- SWOT ANALYSIS
- Corporate Governance in Indian Companies
- No penal action on e-Returns with date stamp of 1s...
- TAX RECENT NOTIFICATIONS
- Income Tax department's website to get new address
- 115JB
- Deloitte, KPMG have no license to do audit work in...
- DEPRECIATION - Avoid Last Moment Purchase
- Failure to remit tax will invite prosecution: IT d...
- 100% I-T Waiver For SEZs Set Up Under Parent Cos
- INVOCATION OF SECTION 263 OF IT ACT ON GROUND OF D...
- ALLOWABILITY OF DEFERRED REVENUE EXPENDITURE UNDER...
- Some Recent Imp Case Laws on Direct Tax
- Appointment of a CS by companies- Limit increased ...
- Notification No.33/2008 ST dt 7th December, 2008.
- INVESTMENT PROOF FOR TDS CALCULATION
- Futures Contract
- No penal action on e-Returns with date stamp of 1s...
- Notification No. 3/2009, dated 5.1.2009 and Notif...
- Notification No. 1/2009, dated 5.1.2009
-
▼
January
(37)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome users to provide your valuable comments