Procedure for filing TDS returns with insufficient deductee PAN
As per instructions issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), it is
mandatory for deductors to file TDS/TCS statements with a threshold limit of
Permanent Account Number (PAN) of deductees. To facilitate deductors who face
problem in filing TDS returns because of insufficiency of PAN of the deductees and
also to accommodate the deductees who have intimated their PAN, the Income Tax
Department (ITD) has specified the following procedure for filing TDS/TCS returns:
Deductors can file a return containing deductee records which meets the
specified threshold limit of PAN quoting, i.e., a deductor can file a return
containing deductee details who have provided valid PAN. It can
subsequently file a correction return with details of remaining deductees.
E.g. as below:
Suppose a challan payment of Rs.1,00,000/- has been made for nonsalary
TDS against 100 deductees each with TDS of Rs.1,000/-. Under
the existing procedure the deductor will have to quote at least 85 PAN
failing which his return will be rejected.
there are only 50 deductees whose PAN is available and the
deductor attempts to file a return with details of 100 deductees with
PAN of only 50 deductees, the return will automatically be rejected at
present.
However, if he files a return with challan amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- and
with details of 50 deductees with PAN, with deductee total of
Rs.50,000/-, the return will be accepted. It means the deductor can
furnish the details relating to such deductees whose PANs are
available.
The deductor can later file correction returns with other details of
remaining deductees with the same challan details, i.e., the challan
amount should be the amount deposited (in this case Rs. 1,00,000/-).
The return will be accepted so long as the TDS total of incremental
deductees is less than or equal to the balance of Rs.50,000/-.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Venkat Dhanyamraju
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(100)
-
▼
January
(37)
- NOTIFICATION NO: 5/2009, Dated : January 7, 2009
- Govt on overdrive to grant service tax refunds to ...
- If only Raju had read Jack Welch
- NOTIFICATION NO. 11/2009
- NOTIFICATION NO. 11/2009
- eTDS Statement without sufficient valid PANs...
- NOTIFICATION NO. 10/2009
- NOTIFICATION NO: 5/2009, Dated : January 7, 2009
- Frauds can not be stopped by a defined audit process
- Software Licensing Not "Royalty"
- Related Party Transactions & Legal Provisions
- CARO, 2003 & Fixed Assets
- Applicability of transfer pricing provisions for r...
- How Satyam May have Inflated Cash & Bank Balance
- Big 4 Audit Firms - Status
- Indian stock markets already showing signs of resi...
- Why read an annual report?
- SWOT ANALYSIS
- Corporate Governance in Indian Companies
- No penal action on e-Returns with date stamp of 1s...
- TAX RECENT NOTIFICATIONS
- Income Tax department's website to get new address
- 115JB
- Deloitte, KPMG have no license to do audit work in...
- DEPRECIATION - Avoid Last Moment Purchase
- Failure to remit tax will invite prosecution: IT d...
- 100% I-T Waiver For SEZs Set Up Under Parent Cos
- INVOCATION OF SECTION 263 OF IT ACT ON GROUND OF D...
- ALLOWABILITY OF DEFERRED REVENUE EXPENDITURE UNDER...
- Some Recent Imp Case Laws on Direct Tax
- Appointment of a CS by companies- Limit increased ...
- Notification No.33/2008 ST dt 7th December, 2008.
- INVESTMENT PROOF FOR TDS CALCULATION
- Futures Contract
- No penal action on e-Returns with date stamp of 1s...
- Notification No. 3/2009, dated 5.1.2009 and Notif...
- Notification No. 1/2009, dated 5.1.2009
-
▼
January
(37)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Welcome users to provide your valuable comments